Live Chat
Today's Hours: 8:00am - 8:00pm
Lane Medical Library

Search

Filter Results

Did You Mean:

Search Results

Sort by
relevance
  • Database
    Digital Access 2004
  • Article
    Ellis WS, Starmer WT.
    Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jul;30(4):366-76.
    Törbel provides an interesting test case for the study of the relationship between inbreeding measured by pedigrees and inbreeding measured by isonymy. At the start of this investigation, we were aware that isonymy could introduce biases into the calculation of the inbreeding coefficient in either direction. However, it was expected that in Switzerland, inbreeding from isonymy would be an overestimate due to patrilocal residence and polyphyletic names. One way of dealing with this problem [13] was not to be concerned with the absolute value of inbreeding but only in the difference between estimates. Any bias introduced in the estimate itself disappears in such comparisons, so that a trend of inbreeding can be ascertained correctly. However, it was considered equally important to subject several populations to both a complete pedigree analysis and an isonymic analysis to determine the relationship between estimates of inbreeding. Despite the fact that several authors (Swedlund [18], for example) warned users of isonymy to exercise caution, the careless application of isonymy still persists. In the present study, estimates of inbreeding from isonymy were brought into line with other methods based on pedigree analysis and population size. However, it was possible to do this only in Törbel where pedigree depth was extensive and relatively complete. Similar corrections are possible only when the distribution of mono- and polyphyletic names is known and when migration data are reliable. If the trouble is taken to make these corrections, the same time and effort might as well be spent in pedigree analysis (when fairly complete ascertainment is possible) to achieve the same end result.
    Digital Access Access Options