Today's Hours: 8:00am - 10:00pm
Lane Medical Library

Search

Filter Results

Did You Mean:

Search Results

Sort by
relevance
  • Book
    Gretchen G. Kimmick, Daniel J. Lenihan, Douglas B. Sawyer, Erica L. Mayer, Dawn L. Hershman, editors.
    Digital Access Springer 2017
  • Article
    Marsh DJ, d'Albis A, Gratzer W.
    Eur J Biochem. 1978 Jan 02;82(1):219-24.
    The binding of ADP to heavy meromyosin, and the separated subfragment 1 components S-1(A1) and S-1 (A2), has been observed by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. The results are compatible with the presence of spectroscopically equivalent and independent sites, one per head, at both 10 degrees C and 25 degrees C. We do not observe the heterogeneity of binding and of the spectroscopic response that has been reported. The binding has also been followed by other methods sensitive to the effect of ligand on the aromatic residues of the protein, viz. intrinsic fluorescence of heavy meromyosin and changes in the near-ultraviolet Cotton effects of myosin, and its active fragments. Within the limits of our experimental precision, the binding profiles, based on concentration of myosin heads, are the same for myosin as for subfragment 1. A perturbation in the circular dichroism is also generated by pyrophosphate, which competes with ADP. The spectra suggest that subsites for the purine ring and the diphosphate can be recognized. The sensitivity of binding profiles obtained by methods of the kind used here to cooperative or antagonistic interactions between the binding sites has been analysed. It is clear that sizeable effects of this nature could be concealed by the binding curves, even for high experimental precision.
    Digital Access Access Options