Live Chat
Today's Hours: 8:00am - 8:00pm
Lane Medical Library

Search

Filter Results

Did You Mean:

Search Results

Sort by
relevance
  • Book
    editor-in-chief, Enrico Ascher ; co-editors, Frank J. Veith, Peter Gloviczki ; associate editors, Keith D. Calligaro [and others].
    Contents:
    pt. 1. Vascular imaging techniques and physiologic testing
    pt. 2. Basic science in vascular diseases
    pt. 3. Basic open vascular techniques
    pt. 4. Open surgical exposure of arteries
    pt. 5. Cerebrovascular insufficiency
    pt. 6. Aortic and iliac aneurysms
    pt. 7. Visceral vessels
    pt. 8. Lower extremity occlusive and non-occlusive arterial disease
    pt. 9. Vascular trauma
    pt. 10. Upper extremity vascular disease
    pt. 11. Arterial-venous malformation, access for hemodialysis and portal hypertension
    pt. 12. Venous and lymphatic disorders
    pt. 13. Amputations and rehabilitation.
    Digital Access Wiley 2012
  • Article
    Rutherford I, Moody V, Gavan TL, Ayers LW, Taylor DL.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Apr;5(4):458-64.
    Three separate hospital clinical microbiology laboratories using three different identification systems participated in the identification of Enterobactericeae from a central pool of 'unknown" clinical isolates. With conventional tubed media, API-20E (Anlytab Products Inc.) and R/B tube (Corning Diagnostics) systems, there was a 91.1% agreement in the species designation. No significant differences at the 95% confidence level were found among the systems. Evaluation of individual tests within the systems used revealed lysine decarboxylase of the conventional and citrate of the API-20E system to be significantly different from the same test within the other two systems. The lysine decarboxylase of the conventional system had species relatedness, whereas the differences in citrate of the API-20E system were not related to a particular species. These individual test variations did not affect final organism identification. Reproducibility, evaluated as the system's ability to designate the same identification on two separate occasions, was 92 to 94% for each system. Exact duplication of selected sets of reactions was 60% for conventional, 45% for API-20E, and 61% for R/B. The variations in sets of reactions differed with the system and with the organism involved. The findings suggest equivalency among the three systems in ability to identify common clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and point out the limited usefulness of these systems for biochemical biotyping.
    Digital Access Access Options