Today's Hours: 8:00am - 8:00pm

Search

Did You Mean:

Search Results

  • Book
    Paul Hofman, editor.
    Contents:
    Acquired Immunodeficiency Disease
    Actinomycosis
    Adenovirus
    Adiaspiromycosis
    Alveolar ecchinococcosis
    Amebiasis
    Ancylostomasis
    Angiostrongyliasis cantonesis infections
    Angiostrongylus costarecensis infections
    Anisakiasis
    Arthropods
    Artifacts
    Ascaridiasis
    Aspergillosis
    Bacillary angiomatosis
    Bacterial infections
    Balantidiasis
    Bartonellosis
    Bilharziasis
    Blastomycosis
    Botriomycosis
    Candidiasis
    Cestoda
    Chlamydiasis
    Coccidioidomycosis
    Cryptococcosis
    Cryptosporidiosis
    Cysticercosis
    Cytopathic effect
    Dirofilariasis
    Ecchinococcosis
    Enterobiasis
    False pathogens
    Fasciolasis
    Filariasis
    Fungal infections
    Fusariasis
    Giardiasis
    Granuloma
    Helminthiasis
    Herpes virus
    Histoplasmosis
    Human Immunodeficiency Virus
    Human Rickettsioses
    Hydatidosis
    Immunodeficiency
    Inflammatory reaction
    Influenza virus
    Isosporiasis
    Leishmaniasis
    Lobomycosis
    Malakoplakia
    Malaria
    Measles
    Microsporidiosis
    Mucormycosis
    Myasis
    Mycetomas
    Mycobacterial infections
    Mycoplasmasis
    Nematodes
    Nocardiosis
    Nontuberculous mycobacteria
    Onchocercosis
    Papillomavirus
    Paracoccidioidomycosis
    Paragonimiasis
    Parasitic infections
    Pentastomiasis
    Phaeohyphomycosis
    Pneumocystosis
    Polyomavirus
    Protothecosis
    Protozoa
    Respiratory syncitial virus
    Rhinoscleroma
    Rhinosporidiosis
    Sarcocytosis
    Scedosporiasis
    Sparganosis
    Sporothricosis
    Strongyloidiasis
    Taeniasis
    Toxoplasmosis
    Trematodes
    Trichinosis
    Trypanosomiasis
    Tuberculosis
    Tungiasis
    Viral Hepatitis
    Viral infections
    Whippleïs disease
    Yersiniasis
    Zygomycosis.
    Digital Access Springer 2016
  • Article
    Eriksson NE.
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1977;53(4):341-8.
    The results of skin tests (ST) were compared with those of 2,055 provocation tests (PT) in 403 patients with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis. The overall agreement between ST and PT results was 77%. Various correlation figures were found for different allergens. In patients with pronounced allergy in the shock organ the prportion of positive ST was higher than in those with low-grade allergy. It is concluded that only strong ST reactions should be relied upon. In other cases additional diagnostic methods are reccommended. The diagnostic precision of ST is of the same order of sizes as that of the radioallergosorbent test.
    Digital Access Access Options