Search
Filter Results
- Resource Type
- Article1
- Book1
- Book Digital1
- Result From
- Lane Catalog1
- PubMed1
-
Year
- Journal Title
- Med Instrum1
Search Results
Sort by
- Book[edited by] Mark S. Weiss, Lee A. Fleisher.Summary: The demand for anesthesiologists outside of the operating room continues to grow as the number of minimally invasive procedures proliferates and the complexity of diagnostic procedures undertaken outside of the OR increase. Non-Operating Room Anesthesia is an easy-to-access, highly visual reference that facilitates an in-depth understanding of NORA procedures and protocols needed to minimize risk and complications and to maximize growth opportunities. Effectively assess and manage risks and differences in procedures through in-depth discussion.
Contents:
Engineering excellence in non-operating room anesthesia care
Designing safety and engineering standards for the non-operating room anesthesia procedure site
Room setup, critical supplies, and medications
The role of the non-operating room anesthetist
Continuous quality improvement for non-operating room anesthesia locations
Critical monitoring issues for non-operating room anesthesia
Intravenous anesthesia and sedation outside the operating room
Practice procedure
Preoperative evaluations
Anesthesia in the catheterization laboratory: valves and devices
Anesthesia for electrophysiology procedures
Anesthesia for cardioversion
High-frequency ventilation for respiratory immobilization
Anesthesia for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Anesthesia for colonoscopy
Anesthesia in the bronchoscopy suite
Adult anesthesia in the radiology suite
Pediatric anesthesia in the radiology suite
Anesthesia concerns in the magnetic resonance imaging environment
Scheduling anesthesia services outside the operating room
Financial and operational analysis for non-operating room anesthesia
Anesthesia and competititve strategies
Development of future systems
Novel staffing coverage for anesthesia outside the operating room.Digital Access ClinicalKey 2015 - ArticleBremer RE.Med Instrum. 1979 Jan-Feb;13(1):16-9.Technology has been made the scapegoat for the increasing cost of health care. Government action in the form of congressional legislation, administrative regulations, funded research, health care payments, etc., has been an important contributing factor in this increasing cost. Microcomputer/microprocessor-based systems such as MUMPS, PROMIS, COSTAR, GeMSAEC, and ASPECT have underutilized potential for producing economies of scale. Quantitative comparative cost data should be developed by every government-sponsored study or project to forcefully prove that more technology results in lowered costs.