Search
Filter Results
- Resource Type
- Article1
- Journal1
- Journal Digital1
- Article Type
- Comparative Study1
- Result From
- Lane Catalog1
- PubMed1
-
Year
- Journal Title
- J Am Dent Assoc1
Search Results
Sort by
- JournalDigital Access
- ArticlePines MS, Schulman A.J Am Dent Assoc. 1979 Nov;99(5):831-3.On the basis of this study, the following conclusions can be made:--Although the primary cause of the diminution of cutting efficiency when composite restorations are cut is due to abrasion, a secondary cause is the adhesion of the melted resin to the flutes.--Amalgams and tooth structures cause significantly less wear to burs than composite restorations.--The design of burs currently used is probably a poor choice to remove composite restorations.