Live Chat
Today's Hours: 8:00am - 10:00pm
Lane Medical Library

Search

Filter Results

Did You Mean:

Search Results

Sort by
relevance
  • Journal
    Print
    Location
    Version
    Call Number
    Items
    Medical History Center: By appointment only.
    1999
  • Article
    Schwartz K, Bouveret P, Sebag C, Leger J, Swynghedauw B.
    Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Nov 25;495(1):24-36.
    Structural differences between various myosins were investigated by means of antibodies to heavy meromyosin, a tryptic subfragment of myosin. Heavy meromyosin was purified from rabbit white skeletal and from pig and human cardiac muscles by gel filtration, and antisera were produced in guinea pigs. Analyses, carried out with the quantitative micro-complement fixation technique, indicated that the antibodies were specific to heavy meromyosin and myosin and not to other contractile proteins. For each muscle type, the corresponding intact myosin reacted, and the degree of dixation was always lower than with heavy meromyosin (50 and 70% fixation respectively). This vertical shift was the same for the three muscle types, indicating that the heavy meromyosin represent corresponding fragments of the myosin molecule from one muscle to the other. Antisera to pig or human cardiac heavy meromyosin clearly distinguished antigens (heavy meromyosins, myosins, or crude extracts) from the ventricles of various heterologous species. Relative to pig, the immunological distances were 50 for the rabbit, 73 for the rat and greater than 100 for human and mice. Relative to human, these values were 20 for the rat, 60 for the rabbit, 72 for the pig. These data provide direct evidence that mammalian cardiac myosin is species-specific.
    Digital Access Access Options