Search
Filter Results
- Resource Type
- Article1
- Book1
- Book Digital1
- Result From
- Lane Catalog1
- PubMed1
-
Year
- Journal Title
- J Bone Joint Surg Br1
Search Results
Sort by
- BookNarrating Patienthood : Engaging Diverse Voices on Health, Communication, and the Patient Experienceedited by Peter M. Kellett.Contents:
Introduction
Narrating patienthood: voicing, empowering, advocating
Narratives of patient experience
From stories to discoveries
Cultural communication competency as a two-way street
If I die, who will tell their stories?
Narrating patienthood: differences that matter
African Americans and hospice care
"Can you please direct me to a doctor that has a heart?"
Exploring the effects of patient-provider communication on the lives of women with vulvodynia
Queer patienthood
An autoethnographic account of navigating patienthood as a person with hearing impairment
Narrating patienthood: intersections of communication and the personal, relational, professional, and cultural
From consumer to community-based researcher
The gendered nature of generosity in post-hysterectomy "dear honey" letters
The narrative journey and decision-making process of plastic surgery patienthood
Narrative sense-making in systemic lupus erthematosus
Healthy mother, healthy baby
Ableist Biases
Index
About the contributors.Digital Access ProQuest Ebook Central [2019] - ArticleMcKibbin B, Rális ZA.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Nov;60-B(4):561-6.Allografts of immature joint cartilage from the knees of lambs were transferred heterotopically into an intramuscular site in animals which had been presensitised by two sets of skin grafts from the same donors. All of these grafts were found to be largely destroyed by the immune response as early as four weeks after transfer. Similar grafts transferred orthotopically into the knees of the recipients, on the other hand, were found to be thriving even after twelve weeks and evoked a minimal response. Heterotopic autografts also provoked a mild though non-specific inflammatory reaction which the orthotopic grafts did not. It is concluded that cartilage matrix is capable of protecting grafts to a remarkable degree even from a severe immunological assault but only when the nutrition is adequate. It is suggested that the conflicting results of similar previous experiments may be explained by variations in the nutritional state of the graft which may be affected by the technique of transplantation used.