Search
Filter Results
- Resource Type
- Article1
- Book1
- Book Digital1
- Article Type
- Review1
- Result From
- Lane Catalog1
- PubMed1
-
Year
- Journal Title
- Ciba Found Symp1
Search Results
Sort by
- Bookeditors: Jeanne Leffers, Claudia M. Smith, Katie Huffling, Ruth McDermott-Levy, Barbara Sattler.Contents:
Introduction
Unit I: Why nursing. Why nurses are involved with environmental health
Environmental health and families/homes
Environmental health in the school setting
Environmental health nursing at the community level
Faith community: an environmental partner
Spotlight on nurses
Desired environmental health competencies for registered nurses
Unit II: Harmful environmental exposures and vulnerable populations. Harmful environmental exposures and vulnerable populations
Vulnerable populations - anticipatory guidance
Immigrants and refugees as a vulnerable population
Unit III: Environmental health sciences. Ecology, ecosystems, and watersheds
Introduction to toxicology
Carcinogens
Criteria air pollutants
Chemicals of concern: flame retardants
Health effects of heavy metals
Environmental public health tracking
Introduction to risk assessment in environmental health
Unit IV: Practice settings. Nurse exposure in work
Hazardous exposures in healthcare
Pharmaceutical waste
Green team
Unit V: Sustainable communities. Introduction to Tox Town
Green building
Green cleaning in homes
Transportation and health implications
Brownfields and nursing implications
Antibiotic use in agriculture: public and environmental health impact
Environmental justice
Unit VI: Climate change. Climate and health
Unit vii: energy
Introduction to the ANA energy resolution
Unconventional natural gas development and nursing
Unit VIII: Advocacy. Using nursing process to guide advocacy for environmental health
Coalition building: a powerful political strategy
Case study in environmental health advocacy
Chemical policy reform - toxic chemicals in the environment: efforts to control and regulate
Anatomy of a legislative meeting
Unit IX: Research. Maria Amaya, PhD, RNC, WHNP-BC
Adelita Cantu, PhD, RN
Viki Chaudrue, EdD, MSN, RN
Rosemary Chaudry, PhD, RN, MHA, MPH, PHCNS-BC
Linda McCauley, RN, PhD, FAAN, FAAOHN
Ruth McDermott-Levy, PhD, MPH, RN
Barbara Polivka, PhD, RN
Elizabeth C Schenk, PhD, MHI, RN
Unit X: Conclusion.Digital Access R2Library 2015 - ArticleAhlstedt S, Carlsson B, Fällström SP, Hanson LA, Holmgren J, Lidin-Janson G, Lindblad BS, Jodal U, Kaijser B, Solh-Akerlund A, Wadsworth C.Ciba Found Symp. 1977 Apr 26-28(46):115-34.Ingestion of Escherichia coli O83 bacteria by adults resulted in a transient irregular colonization leading to a serum antibody response in only four out of 14 cases examined. In all of three pregnant women, however, IgA antibodies against E. coli O83 antigen were released from colostral cells after similar bacterial ingestion although no serum antibody response was noted. The findings indicate a link between the antigenic exposure to the gut and secretory antibodies of the IgA class, presumably locally formed in the mammary gland. Antibodies of the secretory IgA class registered in colostrum may, at least partly, reflect the antigenic exposure of the gut. These antibodies are probably important in protecting against E. coli infections in the neonate, as suggested by the findings of antibodies in human milk against O and K antigens of non-enteropathogenic as well as enteropathogenic serotypes of E. coli. Furthermore, in milk of women from low socio-economic groups in Pakistan, neutralizing antibodies were present against enterotoxins of E. coli bacteria and occasionally against Vibrio cholerae enterotoxins. In addition, secretory IgA antibodies against food proteins were detected in human milk. This suggests that intestinal exposure to such antigens could stimulate a local immune response in the gut resulting in triggered lymphoid cells homing to the mammary gland. These human milk secretory IgA antibodies against bovine milk proteins may help to prevent cow's milk allergy in infants on mixed feeding, since these infants tend to have a lower serum antibody response to cow's milk proteins than infants fed mostly artificially. Furthermore, children suffering from cow's milk protein intolerance and gluten enteropathy may have higher serum levels of antibody to cow's milk protein antigens than normal children, possibly reflecting increased permeability of the intestinal mucosa for various antigens.