Search
Filter Results
- Resource Type
- Article1
- Book1
- Book Digital1
- Article Type
- Comparative Study1
- Result From
- Lane Catalog1
- PubMed1
-
Year
- Journal Title
- J Clin Microbiol1
Search Results
Sort by
- BookMihir S. Wagh, Peter V. Draganov, editors.Contents:
Classification of Pancreatic Lesions
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Less Common Solid Tumors of Pancreas
Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas
Autoimmune pancreatitis
Pancreatitis-related pancreatic masses: Chronic Pancreatitis
Radiographic imaging
EUS Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Masses
Contrast-enhanced EUS
Endoscopic Ultrasonography: Role of EUS Sampling in Solid Pancreas Lesions
Endoscopic Ultrasonography: Role of EUS sampling in Cystic lesions
Role of ERCP in Diagnosing Pancreatic Masses
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): Pancreatoscopy for the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasia
Recent Advances in Cytologic and Histologic Specimen Evaluation, FISH and Molecular Markers
Evaluation and Surveillance Strategies for Patients at Increased Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
Differential Diagnosis and Diagnostic Evaluation Algorithm
Surgery for Solid Pancreatic Neoplasms
Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
Chemotherapy
Endoscopic therapy: ERCP based therapy
Endoscopic therapy: EUS-based therapy
Endoscopic Therapy of Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Management of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas
Recent Advances and Novel Treatments of Pancreatic Masses. - ArticleKagan RL, Schuette WH, Zierdt CH, MacLowry JD.J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jan;5(1):51-7.Lysis and filtration of blood culture specimens were combined with impedance detection of bacterial growth to facilitate the diagnosis of bacteremia. A blood lysis-filtration technique (Zierdt et al., 1976) was coupled to a simple, inexpensive automated detection system. The practical and technical aspects of the impedance detection system are discussed. This new blood culturing system was compared to a conventional system for 264 aerobic blood cultures. A 30-ml sample of the blood-broth mixture was withdrawn from the conventional aerobic blood culture bottle and processed in parallel. Excluding the isolation of the commonly recognized contaminants, the detection efficiency was 36% greater in the new system. A total of 53 blood cultures from 107 patients were positive by one or both methods. The new system detected 92% of the total number of positive cultures, compared with 56% detected by the routine method. The explanation of the differences is discussed.