At the most fundamental level, authors have two options for publishing an academic research paper.
Traditional subscription media
From days of the earliest medical journals (e.g., Lancet, 1823) all the way into the 1990's, medical publishers offered authors the best possible distribution channel for their research papers. The business model of these "traditional" journal publishers has been and continues to be to gather in revenue from readers, subscribers, and use that money to cover their costs for peer review, typesetting,
Today most traditional publishers provide both print and online versions of each issue. In addition to the cost of producing a hard copy, new costs of HTML production and networked computer systems were added.
While the subscription business model worked well for a very very long time, the economics of this model fell apart while competing with the free internet distribution by publishers with internet economics based businesses.
Over the next few years we are likely to see a major change in profile of journals — from traditional subscription to internet only, Open Access journals. Some predict that the subscription model will not endure more than another 6-9 years.
The promulgation of internet applications and users in the 1990's opened the possibility for instantaneous global distribution of research papers. Scientists like Pat Brown here, at Stanford, recognized that the full potential of the research papers internet distribution was possible with a complimentary business model.
Open Access publishing provides the service of instantaneous global distribution of research papers by founding the operation on a business model designed for internet, not print. Open Access approach is not bound by the constraints of traditional publishing.
By gathering their revenue from the researchers, authors, or their funders, OA service providers are able to offer the best value to both the author and reader.
By posting the papers on the web and allowing them to be full-text indexed by all search engines, PubMed, etc., Open Access publishers provide global dissemination and offer more publicity to the authors.
By offering full-text searchable articles for free, Open Access publishers provide unbounded access for the readers.
Traditional and Open Access (OA) Published Article Comparison
Comparison of key factors to consider when choosing where to publish an academic article.
Journal published online with no limitations
Content available for 6-12 months only to subscribers, then freely available
Author or funder pays for article to be freely available within a subscription journal
|Cost to Article Author/Funder||Free||$||$$||$$|
|Cost to University||$$$$ to subscribe||Free||Free after embargo||
OA articles: free
Journal: $$$$ to subscribe
|Ownership Rights||Publisher||Author||Author||Varies by publisher|
|Reader Access and Discoverability of Article||
Requires subscription to accessFull-text not indexed by search engines; only on publisher’s site
Free online accessFull-text indexed by search engines
|After embargo period: Free online access and full-text indexed by search engines||
Free Access (may not display as free in PubMed)
Full-text not indexed by search engines; only on publisher’s site
|Supporting Data||Not published
||Published, freely available||Varies with publisher||Varies with publisher|
The requirement that research supported by NIH funds be publicly available is independent of the publishing option chosen.
NIH requires that articles from NIH grants be submitted to
PMC within 12 months of original publication.
More about how to meet the NIH requirement »
OA in the News
- Faculty of 1000 Introduces a Novel Open Access Publishing Venture: F1000 Research
MarketWatch; Jan. 31, 2012
- Public Works Act Prohibits Government Funders from Requiring Open Access to USG Grant-Funded
infojustice.org; January 8, 2012
- New Journal Edited by Life Scientists Hopes to Lure Prestige
The Chronicle of Higher Education; Nov. 27, 2011
- The New Einsteins Will Be Scientists Who Share
WSJ.com; Oct 29, 2011